The Pros and Cons of Crowdsourcing

Crowdsourcing — the act of taking a job traditionally performed by a designated agent and outsourcing it to an undefined, generally large group of people — has been a hot topic across the web, stirring up controversy as well as passionate support. Outside of the translation world, crowdsourced projects like Wikipedia continue to flourish with over 16 million articles written and edited by over 91,000 contributors in over 270 languages. Although it isn’t perfect, Wikipedia is certainly powerful — and it uses its vast number of participants to help guide it in the right direction.

Crowdsourced Translation

Efforts to crowdsource translation, however, have been a mixed bag. Many translators, as well as the American Translators Association, were up in arms when LinkedIn asked professional translators to crowdsource its website last year. On the other hand, charitable organizations such as Kiva have harnessed the power of volunteer translators to help alleviate poverty around the world.

One company that has produced crowdsourced translations with both resounding success and huge criticism is Facebook. Through its Facebook Translations application, Facebook has used its members to localize its interface into more than 100 different languages. While its success in reaching users around the world has been heralded by many, Facebook has also encountered one of the biggest problems with crowdsourcing: Quality control.

Quality Control & Crowdsourcing

One advantage to crowdsourcing is the sheer number of eyes looking at the material. Wikipedia, for example, uses its thousands of contributors to watch for errors and biases in its articles. However, a thousand untrained eyes may not catch an error that a handful of professionals would see right away. When Facebook introduced its translated interface, it was criticized by many Spanish speakers for its numerous errors and misspellings. And just recently, users took advantage of a flaw in the Facebook Translations application to replace correct translations with profanity.

In other words, crowdsourcing often skips the quality control offered by professional translators — both in terms of their skill and the review process they use.

What Professional Translators Can Learn From Crowdsourcing

Crowdsourcing is not going to go away, and translators will only lose out by trying to ignore it. Many organizations are successfully using crowdsourced translation, despite its flaws, to further their causes.


  • Many potential clients aren’t aware of the benefits of professional translation. By increasing client education and highlighting the quality control benefits of using professional translation services, translators can attract companies and organizations that require high-quality translations.
  • Many organizations need a “good enough” translation instead of a perfect one, and the work of amateur volunteers is good enough. It is important to remember that many organizations using crowdsourced translation will always want a faster or cheaper solution; translators must target potential clients that truly need professional services.
  • The sheer volume of material to be translated is more than any one translator can take on. Perhaps it’s time for translators to start building their own model of crowdsourcing, harnessing the power of the crowd with the quality control of a professional — whether this means professional, paid translators overseeing amateur volunteers or a group of end users providing input on a professional project. Some translators and agencies are starting to move in this direction, and it’s a direction worth exploring.

Rachel McRoberts is a freelance Spanish to English translator based in San Diego. Her business, which offers translation, editing, and desktop publishing services, aims to translate Spanish into success for every client she serves. You can contact her through her website or on Twitter at @RMTranslations.

1 Comment
  • Roman Mironov
    Posted at 08:22h, 26 October Reply

    I think that one of the main roadblocks to using crowdsourcing by translation agencies is that translators interested in this type of work often won’t be able to see or benefit from the results of their volunteered time. For example, with Wikipedia, you can author a comprehensive, useful article and then sit back, enjoying the look of your work and collecting rewarding feedback from other authors or users. Translation agencies, however, cannot always offer this type of emotional reward, because the translation as a final product is often intended for a very small audience or even can’t be shared with the translators for various reasons.

    Yes, translating Facebook might indeed be an appealing task, but will the same translators have similar motivation for translating e.g. a user manual intended for just a small team of engineers somewhere in Slovenia?

Post A Comment

Skip to content