Beyond Words - Language Blog

Norm-Referenced vs. Criterion-Referenced Testing

You may have had an experience where you took a test for a class, and the instructor showed you the class’s results afterwards. The results probably mapped out into the infamous “bell-shaped curve”, with a few people scoring on the low end of the curve, the majority clustering in the middle, and a few people scoring on the high end. What you may not have known is that this is a normal distribution found in norm-referenced testing.

Norm-referenced tests (or NRTs) compare an examinee’s performance to that of other examinees. Standardized examinations such as the SAT are norm-referenced tests. The goal is to rank the set of examinees so that decisions about their opportunity for success (e.g. college entrance) can be made.

Criterion-referenced tests (or CRTs) differ in that each examinee’s performance is compared to a pre-defined set of criteria or a standard. The goal with these tests is to determine whether or not the candidate has the demonstrated mastery of a certain skill or set of skills. These results are usually “pass” or “fail” and are used in making decisions about job entry, certification, or licensure. A national board medical exam is an example of a CRT. Either the examinee has the skills to practice the profession, in which case he or she is licensed, or does not.

ALTA’s exams, which measure the candidate’s performance against pre-defined criteria (the performance levels), are also an example of criterion-referenced tests. Based on the passing level set by ALTA or the client, the results can then be used to determine whether or not the candidate meets the performance requirements of the job from a language standpoint.

To learn how we can help you with language testing, please fill out our simple contact form, or read about some of our tests:
Medical Language Test
Translation Assessment
Interpreter Assessment
Language Job Analysis
Speaking and Listening Test
Writing Skills Test
Reading Comprehension Test

Contact Language Testing

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.


  1. it has been a great help in understanding both the ideas especially examples have made it easier. thanks really…

  2. thanks greatly ,really I have agreat idea about both kinds of tests but Iwant to know about using them in mock exams

  3. Pingback: “I didn’t fail the test, I just found 100 ways to do it wrong.”  | Leaky Grammar

  4. Pingback: Norm-referenced assessment is better than Criterion-referenced assessment | Psychology Diary

  5. Pingback: Basic Terminologies | Online Portfolio

  6. Pingback: EDS 113 Module 2: Basic Terminologies | A Portfolio on EDS 113: Principles and Methods of Assessment

  7. Pingback: Basic Terminologies | mariaasterjoygarcia

  8. Pingback: Assignment 1: Glossary | maezarsanchez

  9. Pingback: Assignment #1 | mharmieleesungag

  10. Pingback: Basic Terminologies and Concepts | Herbert Felix A. Semilla

  11. Pingback: Assessment 101 | musingsofmommygie

  12. Pingback: Putting my son through his paces for college entrance exams is more like purgatory, than hell | EDUCATION IN JAPAN COMMUNITY Blog

  13. Pingback: T-and-A Assessment « Jose suzuki santos

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *